Flowise vs Make — Pricing, Plans, and Verified Costs (2026)
Make starts at $12/mo. Flowise uses custom pricing — request a quote to compare.
How pricing works
These two tools don't price the same way, so the headline numbers below aren't directly comparable until you plug in your own volume.
- Flowise (Hybrid) — Flowise is hybrid: a fixed subscription plus metered usage on top. Your real bill moves with volume, not seat count.
- Make (Per Usage) — Make bills purely on usage — Operations/credits per month. There is no fixed per-seat fee, so the monthly cost depends entirely on how much you consume.
Per-minute, per-credit and per-token rates exclude any downstream model, speech or telephony costs unless the vendor states otherwise.
Open-source AI agent + LLM workflow builder with visual drag-and-drop UI. Flowise Cloud pricing: Free (limited flows), Starter $35/mo (unlimited flows, 100K predictions), Pro $65/mo (300K predictions + team features), Enterprise custom. Self-hosted version is fully free (Apache 2.0). Popular with developers who want a visual LangChain alternative without writing code.
Visual workflow automation (formerly Integromat), positioned as the power-user alternative to Zapier. Distinctive for its visual scenario builder that handles complex multi-branch logic Zapier can't. Priced per operation with 1,000 free ops/month. Popular with developers, ops teams, and agencies who hit Zapier's complexity ceiling. Growing share from Zapier and losing some to n8n (self-hostable) as low-code automation splinters into three tiers by user sophistication.
All plans compared
| Tier role | Plan | Flowise monthly | Flowise annual | Make monthly | Make annual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free / starter | Self-hosted / Free | Free | Free | Free | Free |
| Entry paid | Starter / Core | $35 | $35 | $12 | $9 |
| Pro / power | Pro | $65 | $65 | $21 | $16 |
| Teams | — / Teams | — | — | $38 | $29 |
| Enterprise | Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Custom | Custom |
Tier names differ across vendors. Rows are aligned by tier role, not name. Full tier structures on each tool's page.
What each is best for
Flowise is worth it if… developers who want to build AI agent workflows visually without writing LangChain code. 0), which makes it a serious option for teams that already run their own infrastructure.
Make is worth it if… ops-savvy solopreneurs and small teams that need visual automation across hundreds of apps — particularly if you value flexibility over Zapier's simplicity. Free tier covers 1,000 ops/month; Core adds more ops and premium apps; Pro adds priority execution; Teams adds team collaboration.
Bottom line: Choose based on how you want to pay — Flowise is hybrid, Make is per usage.
Choose Flowise over Make if…
Choose Flowise if…
- You're fine with a base subscription plus metered usage on top (custom pricing).
- You match the profile Flowise is built for: developers who want to build AI agent workflows visually without writing LangChain code.
- You need a general-purpose developer & infrastructure option rather than a vertical-specific one.
Choose Make if…
- You want to pay only for actual usage (per usage, from $12/mo).
- You match the profile Make is built for: ops-savvy solopreneurs and small teams that need visual automation across hundreds of apps — particularly if you value flexibility over Zapier's simplicity.
- You need a general-purpose developer & infrastructure option rather than a vertical-specific one.
At a glance
| Flowise | Make | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Entry price | Custom | $12/mo |
| Enterprise available | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing model | Hybrid | Per Usage |
| Last verified | — | September 12, 2026 |
| Full pricing | View full pricing | View full pricing |
Pricing last verified September 12, 2026. Tracked daily.