Lytics vs Treasure Data — Pricing, Plans, and Verified Costs (2026)
Both Lytics and Treasure Data use custom pricing — request quotes from each to compare.
See price history: Lytics · Treasure Data
How pricing works
These two tools don't price the same way, so the headline numbers below aren't directly comparable until you plug in your own volume.
- Lytics (Per Usage) — Lytics bills purely on usage — Credits (one credit = one user profile update). There is no fixed per-seat fee, so the monthly cost depends entirely on how much you consume.
- Treasure Data (Per Usage) — Treasure Data bills purely on usage — Stored customer profiles and behavioural events. There is no fixed per-seat fee, so the monthly cost depends entirely on how much you consume.
Per-minute, per-credit and per-token rates exclude any downstream model, speech or telephony costs unless the vendor states otherwise.
A composable, Google Cloud-native CDP acquired by Contentstack in January 2025. Its connectivity design leans on running inside your own cloud: it deploys into your Google Cloud project and works directly against BigQuery, so customer data never leaves your infrastructure, while still syncing audiences out to ad platforms, email tools and personalisation engines. Under Contentstack it is being positioned alongside the CMS, pairing content management with audience data so that personalisation decisions and the content they serve sit in one stack. Billed in credits, where one credit is one update to a user profile.
An enterprise CDP whose selling point is handling messy, high-volume data environments — 170+ connectors spanning online and offline sources, including point-of-sale, call-centre, IoT and legacy systems that most CDPs cannot ingest. That offline-to-online stitching is why it shows up in retail, automotive and consumer goods, where the customer exists in systems that predate the web. In August 2026 it introduced a 'No Compute' pricing model that removes query and activation fees and charges only for stored profiles and events — a direct answer to the unpredictable-bill complaint that dogs consumption-priced CDPs. Gartner classes it a Challenger in 2026.
All plans compared
| Tier role | Plan | Lytics monthly | Lytics annual | Treasure Data monthly | Treasure Data annual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free / starter | Developer / — | Free | Free | — | — |
| Enterprise | Enterprise / — | Custom | Custom | — | — |
Tier names differ across vendors. Rows are aligned by tier role, not name. Full tier structures on each tool's page.
What each is best for
Lytics is worth it if… Lytics appeals to teams already standardised on Google Cloud who want a CDP that does not become another data silo. The credit model is unusually legible — you can reason about cost by estimating profile updates rather than decoding tiers.
Treasure Data is worth it if… Treasure Data earns its place when your customer data is genuinely fragmented across systems nobody wants to touch. The 2026 'No Compute' change matters more than it sounds: charging for stored data rather than queries means running more analysis doesn't increase the bill, which removes the incentive to under-use the platform you already paid for.
Bottom line: Similar positioning, closer to a preference call than a strategic one.
Choose Lytics over Treasure Data if…
Choose Lytics if…
- You want to pay only for actual usage (per usage, a free entry tier).
- You match the profile Lytics is built for: Lytics appeals to teams already standardised on Google Cloud who want a CDP that does not become another data silo.
- You need a general-purpose cdp (customer data platform) option rather than a vertical-specific one.
Choose Treasure Data if…
- You want to pay only for actual usage (per usage, a free entry tier).
- You match the profile Treasure Data is built for: Treasure Data earns its place when your customer data is genuinely fragmented across systems nobody wants to touch.
- You're building for automotive.
At a glance
| Lytics | Treasure Data | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Entry price | Pricing not published | Custom pricing |
| Enterprise available | Yes | No |
| Pricing model | Per Usage | Per Usage |
| Verification | Checked September 24, 2026 | Checked September 24, 2026 |
| Full pricing | View full pricing | View full pricing |
Pricing last verified September 24, 2026. Tracked daily.