Magic vs OpenObserve — Pricing, Plans, and Verified Costs (2026)
OpenObserve starts at Free. Magic uses custom pricing — request a quote to compare.
See price history: Magic · OpenObserve
How pricing works
These two tools don't price the same way, so the headline numbers below aren't directly comparable until you plug in your own volume.
- Magic (Per Usage) — Magic bills purely on usage. There is no fixed per-seat fee, so the monthly cost depends entirely on how much you consume.
- OpenObserve (Per Usage) — OpenObserve bills purely on usage — $0.50/GB ingest + $0.01/GB query (30% off annual, no per-seat fees). There is no fixed per-seat fee, so the monthly cost depends entirely on how much you consume.
Per-minute, per-credit and per-token rates exclude any downstream model, speech or telephony costs unless the vendor states otherwise.
Frontier AI research lab building autonomous coding models with long-context capability (up to 100M tokens claimed). All pricing custom-quoted, enterprise-only. Partnered with Google Cloud for infrastructure. Focus on enterprise engineering teams that need agent capabilities with massive context windows. No self-serve.
OpenObserve is a Datadog/Splunk/New Relic alternative positioned on transparent pay-as-you-go pricing with no per-seat or per-host fees. Cloud PAYG: $0.50/GB ingestion + $0.01/GB query (30% off with annual commit). Includes 15-month metrics retention + 30-day non-metrics retention default. Enterprise adds SSO/RBAC, AI SRE agent, BYO bucket infinite retention. Self-hosted OSS is free; Self-hosted Enterprise free up to 50GB/day.
All plans compared
| Tier role | Plan | Magic monthly | Magic annual | OpenObserve monthly | OpenObserve annual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free / starter | — / Cloud Professional (PAYG) | — | — | Free | Free |
| Enterprise | Enterprise / Cloud Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Custom | Custom |
Tier names differ across vendors. Rows are aligned by tier role, not name. Full tier structures on each tool's page.
What each is best for
Magic is worth it if… Magic is only worth engaging with if you're a large engineering org that specifically needs an AI agent with a very long context window (repositories >1M lines, or complex multi-repo reasoning). The 100M-token context claim is the differentiator.
OpenObserve is worth it if… OpenObserve is ideal for teams migrating off Datadog, Splunk, or New Relic who want radically transparent pay-per-GB pricing with no seat fees. Best if your telemetry cost is dominated by log and metric volume rather than user count.
Bottom line: Similar positioning, closer to a preference call than a strategic one.
Choose Magic over OpenObserve if…
Choose Magic if…
- You want to pay only for actual usage (per usage, custom pricing).
- You match the profile Magic is built for: only worth engaging with if you're a large engineering org that specifically needs an AI agent with a very long context window (repositories >1M lines, or complex multi-repo reasoning).
- You need a general-purpose developer & infrastructure option rather than a vertical-specific one.
Choose OpenObserve if…
- You want to pay only for actual usage (per usage, a free entry tier).
- You match the profile OpenObserve is built for: ideal for teams migrating off Datadog, Splunk, or New Relic who want radically transparent pay-per-GB pricing with no seat fees.
- You need a general-purpose developer & infrastructure option rather than a vertical-specific one.
At a glance
| Magic | OpenObserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Entry price | Custom | Free |
| Enterprise available | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing model | Per Usage | Per Usage |
| Last verified | — | September 16, 2026 |
| Full pricing | View full pricing | View full pricing |
Pricing last verified September 16, 2026. Tracked daily.