OpenObserve vs Xata — Pricing, Plans, and Verified Costs (2026)
Xata starts at $9/mo. OpenObserve uses custom pricing — request a quote to compare.
See price history: OpenObserve · Xata
How pricing works
These two tools don't price the same way, so the headline numbers below aren't directly comparable until you plug in your own volume.
- OpenObserve (Per Usage) — OpenObserve bills purely on usage — $0.50/GB ingest + $0.01/GB query (30% off annual, no per-seat fees). There is no fixed per-seat fee, so the monthly cost depends entirely on how much you consume.
- Xata (Unknown model) — Xata bills on a fixed plan from $9/mo, so the listed price is what you pay regardless of volume.
Per-minute, per-credit and per-token rates exclude any downstream model, speech or telephony costs unless the vendor states otherwise.
OpenObserve is a Datadog/Splunk/New Relic alternative positioned on transparent pay-as-you-go pricing with no per-seat or per-host fees. Cloud PAYG: $0.50/GB ingestion + $0.01/GB query (30% off with annual commit). Includes 15-month metrics retention + 30-day non-metrics retention default. Enterprise adds SSO/RBAC, AI SRE agent, BYO bucket infinite retention. Self-hosted OSS is free; Self-hosted Enterprise free up to 50GB/day.
Serverless Postgres with copy-on-write branches and scale-to-zero. Positioned as the cheapest pure-Postgres alternative to Neon and Supabase for cost-conscious teams. Distinctive for zero-copy branching (spinning up a dev branch of production data costs almost nothing). Restructured 2026 to pure pay-as-you-go pricing — no more $25/mo Pro subscription. Xata Cloud now bills purely on compute-hours ($0.012/hr micro instance minimum ~$9/mo always-on) + storage ($0.28/GB/mo). Open Source tier free (self-hosted). Popular with indie hackers, lean startups, and AI-agent platforms where every dollar of infra matters.
All plans compared
| Tier role | Plan | OpenObserve monthly | OpenObserve annual | Xata monthly | Xata annual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free / starter | Cloud Professional (PAYG) / Open Source | Free | Free | Free | Free |
| Entry paid | — / Xata Cloud | — | — | $9 | $9 |
| Enterprise | Cloud Enterprise / — | Custom | Custom | — | — |
Tier names differ across vendors. Rows are aligned by tier role, not name. Full tier structures on each tool's page.
What each is best for
OpenObserve is worth it if… OpenObserve is ideal for teams migrating off Datadog, Splunk, or New Relic who want radically transparent pay-per-GB pricing with no seat fees. Best if your telemetry cost is dominated by log and metric volume rather than user count.
Xata is worth it if… developers building modern serverless apps that want Postgres + copy-on-write branching + scale-to-zero — particularly if you're spawning many dev branches or running per-tenant databases for AI agents. 28/GB/mo.
Bottom line: Similar positioning, closer to a preference call than a strategic one.
Choose OpenObserve over Xata if…
Choose OpenObserve if…
- You want to pay only for actual usage (per usage, a free entry tier).
- You match the profile OpenObserve is built for: ideal for teams migrating off Datadog, Splunk, or New Relic who want radically transparent pay-per-GB pricing with no seat fees.
- You need a general-purpose developer & infrastructure option rather than a vertical-specific one.
Choose Xata if…
- You're comfortable with Xata's from $9/mo entry point.
- You match the profile Xata is built for: developers building modern serverless apps that want Postgres + copy-on-write branching + scale-to-zero — particularly if you're spawning many dev branches or running per-tenant databases for AI agents.
- You need a general-purpose developer & infrastructure option rather than a vertical-specific one.
At a glance
| OpenObserve | Xata | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Entry price | Free | $9/mo |
| Enterprise available | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing model | Per Usage | — |
| Verification | Pricing under review | Pricing under review |
| Full pricing | View full pricing | View full pricing |
Pricing last verified September 28, 2026. Verification cadence varies by tool; check each tool page.