Cursor vs Sourcegraph Cody — Pricing, Plans, and Verified Costs (2026)
Cursor starts at $20/mo. Sourcegraph Cody starts at $59/mo. Cursor is $39/mo cheaper on the entry tier than Sourcegraph Cody.
See price history: Cursor · Sourcegraph Cody
How pricing works
These two tools don't price the same way, so the headline numbers below aren't directly comparable until you plug in your own volume.
- Cursor (Hybrid) — Cursor is hybrid: a fixed subscription from $20/mo plus metered usage on top (Pro). Your real bill moves with volume, not seat count.
- Sourcegraph Cody (Per Seat) — Sourcegraph Cody bills on a fixed plan from $59/mo, so the listed price is what you pay regardless of volume.
Per-minute, per-credit and per-token rates exclude any downstream model, speech or telephony costs unless the vendor states otherwise.
AI-first code editor built on VS Code, and the reference product in the AI-coding category. Every paid plan includes a credit pool equal to the subscription price, consumed by AI operations at underlying LLM token cost. Pricing: Hobby free, Pro $20/mo, Pro+ $60/mo, Ultra $200/mo, Teams $40/user/mo, Enterprise custom. Annual billing ~20% off. Powers Anysphere's growth to $500M+ ARR.
AI code assistant from Sourcegraph, positioned as the enterprise-grade alternative to GitHub Copilot with deep code-graph awareness. Pricing: Free (200 autocompletions/day, 20 chat messages/day), Pro $9/user/mo (unlimited usage + premium models), Enterprise Starter $19/user/mo (SSO, audit logs, admin controls), Enterprise custom. The Sourcegraph code graph is the moat — Cody knows your entire codebase, not just the open file.
All plans compared
| Tier role | Plan | Cursor monthly | Cursor annual | Sourcegraph Cody monthly | Sourcegraph Cody annual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free / starter | Hobby / — | Free | Free | — | — |
| Entry paid | Pro / — | $20 | $16 | — | — |
| Mid tier | Pro+ / — | $60 | $48 | — | — |
| Pro / power | Ultra / — | $200 | $160 | — | — |
| Teams | Teams / — | $40 | $32 | — | — |
| Enterprise | Enterprise | Custom | Custom | $59 | $59 |
Tier names differ across vendors. Rows are aligned by tier role, not name. Full tier structures on each tool's page.
What each is best for
Cursor is worth it if… developers who want an AI-native editor where autocomplete, chat, and agent-mode Composer feel like extensions of the IDE — not bolted on. The credit-pool model is the interesting pricing innovation: your $20 subscription IS your $20 of AI usage, so heavy Claude Opus users burn faster than lighter GPT-5 mini users.
Sourcegraph Cody is worth it if… engineering orgs (50+ devs) that already use Sourcegraph or need Cody's deep code-graph context — the ability to reason across an entire monorepo. Pro at $9/user/mo is aggressively priced vs Cursor and Copilot but the strategic buyer is Enterprise Starter and above.
Bottom line: Choose based on how you want to pay — Cursor is hybrid, Sourcegraph Cody is per seat.
Choose Cursor over Sourcegraph Cody if…
Choose Cursor if…
- You want the most mature agentic editor with the deepest model line-up.
- You're a developer who lives in the editor and wants long-context, multi-file edits.
- You want predictable seat pricing with usage-based headroom when you need it.
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You want fixed-price predictability (per seat, from $59/mo).
- You match the profile Sourcegraph Cody is built for: engineering orgs (50+ devs) that already use Sourcegraph or need Cody's deep code-graph context — the ability to reason across an entire monorepo.
- You need a general-purpose developer & infrastructure option rather than a vertical-specific one.
At a glance
| Cursor | Sourcegraph Cody | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Entry price | $20/mo | $59/mo |
| Enterprise available | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing model | Hybrid | Per Seat |
| Last verified | September 10, 2026 | September 20, 2026 |
| Full pricing | View full pricing | View full pricing |
Pricing last verified September 20, 2026. Tracked daily.