Developer & InfrastructurePricing under review

Sourcegraph Cody Pricing

Sourcegraph Cody · Developer & Infrastructure

AI code assistant from Sourcegraph, positioned as the enterprise-grade alternative to GitHub Copilot with deep code-graph awareness. Pricing: Free (200 autocompletions/day, 20 chat messages/day), Pro $9/user/mo (unlimited usage + premium models), Enterprise Starter $19/user/mo (SSO, audit logs, admin controls), Enterprise custom. The Sourcegraph code graph is the moat — Cody knows your entire codebase, not just the open file.

In other words, Sourcegraph Cody is worth it for engineering orgs (50+ devs) that already use Sourcegraph or need Cody's deep code-graph context — the ability to reason across an entire monorepo. Pro at $9/user/mo is aggressively priced vs Cursor and Copilot but the strategic buyer is Enterprise Starter and above. Free tier is generous enough for individuals to evaluate. Downside: without Sourcegraph as your code search layer, the code-graph advantage is less pronounced.

📈 See price history Visit website

Pricing summary

Starting price

Custom pricing

Contact sales →

Pricing model

Per Seat

Per user / per month

Key limit

Varies by plan

Depends on tier

Free trial

Not applicable

Pricing verified for United States.View full pricing details on Sourcegraph Cody's website

Machine-readable pricing: pricing.md ↓

See all tracked changes →

Alternatives to consider

Just want an IDE with AI? Cursor or Windsurf. Prefer autocomplete-first with the widest editor support? GitHub Copilot. Need on-prem with air-gap? Sourcegraph Enterprise — or Tabnine.

All plans

See a plain-English answer to “How much does Sourcegraph Cody cost?” →

Plan	Monthly	Annual	Key limit
Enterprise	Custom	Custom	contact sales only; page states 'Starting at $16K minimum annual contract, includes credits for AI features, scales with team size'. Code Search, Deep Search (AI), Batch Changes, Insights, Monitoring, MCP server/API/CLI, single-tenant cloud or self-hosted, 24x5 support.
NOTE: no per-seat price is published. The Cody brand no longer appears on the pricing page; Cody Free/Pro/Enterprise Starter were discontinued 2025-07-23.	Custom	Custom	—

Pricing under review · View source →

View price history →

Price history

Price tracking is just getting started for Sourcegraph Cody. Full history will build as we log changes. See what we have so far →

Common questions about Sourcegraph Cody

Is Sourcegraph Cody worth it?: Sourcegraph Cody is worth it for engineering orgs (50+ devs) that already use Sourcegraph or need Cody's deep code-graph context — the ability to reason across an entire monorepo. Pro at $9/user/mo is aggressively priced vs Cursor and Copilot but the strategic buyer is Enterprise Starter and above.
What are the pricing tiers of Sourcegraph Cody?: Sourcegraph Cody has 2 plans: Enterprise (custom), NOTE: no per-seat price is published. The Cody brand no longer appears on the pricing page; Cody Free/Pro/Enterprise Starter were discontinued 2025-07-23. (custom).
How is Sourcegraph Cody priced — per usage or subscription?: Sourcegraph Cody is priced per seat. You pay a recurring subscription rather than metered usage.

Frequently asked questions

About Sourcegraph Cody pricing.

Sourcegraph Cody does not publish standard pricing. Pricing is quoted per customer based on requirements.

Free-plan and free-trial availability for Sourcegraph Cody isn't confirmed in our tracker yet.

Sourcegraph Cody does not publish pricing publicly. Pricing is quoted per customer based on requirements.

Sourcegraph Cody's pricing has been stable since Nov 4, 2026. See full history at /tools/sourcegraph-cody/price-history.

Sourcegraph Cody does not publish standard pricing, so a direct comparison isn't possible. For reference, the cheapest publicly-priced Developer & Infrastructure tool we track is GitHub at $4/month.

Alternatives in Developer & Infrastructure (61)

See how Sourcegraph Cody compares to other Developer & Infrastructure tools we track. Vendor-sourced prices; check each tool page for its verification date.