Magic vs Sourcegraph Cody — Pricing, Plans, and Verified Costs (2026)
Sourcegraph Cody starts at $59/mo. Magic uses custom pricing — request a quote to compare.
See price history: Magic · Sourcegraph Cody
How pricing works
These two tools don't price the same way, so the headline numbers below aren't directly comparable until you plug in your own volume.
- Magic (Per Usage) — Magic bills purely on usage. There is no fixed per-seat fee, so the monthly cost depends entirely on how much you consume.
- Sourcegraph Cody (Per Seat) — Sourcegraph Cody bills on a fixed plan from $59/mo, so the listed price is what you pay regardless of volume.
Per-minute, per-credit and per-token rates exclude any downstream model, speech or telephony costs unless the vendor states otherwise.
Frontier AI research lab building autonomous coding models with long-context capability (up to 100M tokens claimed). All pricing custom-quoted, enterprise-only. Partnered with Google Cloud for infrastructure. Focus on enterprise engineering teams that need agent capabilities with massive context windows. No self-serve.
AI code assistant from Sourcegraph, positioned as the enterprise-grade alternative to GitHub Copilot with deep code-graph awareness. Pricing: Free (200 autocompletions/day, 20 chat messages/day), Pro $9/user/mo (unlimited usage + premium models), Enterprise Starter $19/user/mo (SSO, audit logs, admin controls), Enterprise custom. The Sourcegraph code graph is the moat — Cody knows your entire codebase, not just the open file.
All plans compared
| Tier role | Plan | Magic monthly | Magic annual | Sourcegraph Cody monthly | Sourcegraph Cody annual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | Enterprise | Custom | Custom | $59 | $59 |
Tier names differ across vendors. Rows are aligned by tier role, not name. Full tier structures on each tool's page.
What each is best for
Magic is worth it if… Magic is only worth engaging with if you're a large engineering org that specifically needs an AI agent with a very long context window (repositories >1M lines, or complex multi-repo reasoning). The 100M-token context claim is the differentiator.
Sourcegraph Cody is worth it if… engineering orgs (50+ devs) that already use Sourcegraph or need Cody's deep code-graph context — the ability to reason across an entire monorepo. Pro at $9/user/mo is aggressively priced vs Cursor and Copilot but the strategic buyer is Enterprise Starter and above.
Bottom line: Choose based on how you want to pay — Magic is per usage, Sourcegraph Cody is per seat.
Choose Magic over Sourcegraph Cody if…
Choose Magic if…
- You want to pay only for actual usage (per usage, custom pricing).
- You match the profile Magic is built for: only worth engaging with if you're a large engineering org that specifically needs an AI agent with a very long context window (repositories >1M lines, or complex multi-repo reasoning).
- You need a general-purpose developer & infrastructure option rather than a vertical-specific one.
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You want fixed-price predictability (per seat, from $59/mo).
- You match the profile Sourcegraph Cody is built for: engineering orgs (50+ devs) that already use Sourcegraph or need Cody's deep code-graph context — the ability to reason across an entire monorepo.
- You need a general-purpose developer & infrastructure option rather than a vertical-specific one.
At a glance
| Magic | Sourcegraph Cody | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Entry price | Custom | $59/mo |
| Enterprise available | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing model | Per Usage | Per Seat |
| Last verified | — | September 20, 2026 |
| Full pricing | View full pricing | View full pricing |
Pricing last verified September 20, 2026. Tracked daily.