Sourcegraph Cody vs Tabnine — Pricing, Plans, and Verified Costs (2026)
Both Sourcegraph Cody and Tabnine use custom pricing — request quotes from each to compare.
See price history: Sourcegraph Cody · Tabnine
AI code assistant from Sourcegraph, positioned as the enterprise-grade alternative to GitHub Copilot with deep code-graph awareness. Pricing: Free (200 autocompletions/day, 20 chat messages/day), Pro $9/user/mo (unlimited usage + premium models), Enterprise Starter $19/user/mo (SSO, audit logs, admin controls), Enterprise custom. The Sourcegraph code graph is the moat — Cody knows your entire codebase, not just the open file.
AI code completion tool with a security/enterprise focus — offers a fully self-hosted/on-prem deployment where no code ever leaves the customer's infrastructure. Pricing: Dev $9/user/mo (annual, cloud), Enterprise $39/user/mo (SSO, admin controls, on-prem option), Enterprise-plus custom. Popular with regulated industries (finance, healthcare, defense) that can't use cloud AI coding tools.
All plans compared
| Tier role | Plan | Sourcegraph Cody monthly | Sourcegraph Cody annual | Tabnine monthly | Tabnine annual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | Enterprise / Contact sales only | Custom | Custom | Custom | Custom |
Tier names differ across vendors. Rows are aligned by tier role, not name. Full tier structures on each tool's page.
What each is best for
Sourcegraph Cody is worth it if… engineering orgs (50+ devs) that already use Sourcegraph or need Cody's deep code-graph context — the ability to reason across an entire monorepo. Pro at $9/user/mo is aggressively priced vs Cursor and Copilot but the strategic buyer is Enterprise Starter and above.
Tabnine is worth it if… regulated enterprises (banks, hospitals, defense) that need AI code completion but cannot ship code to a cloud LLM. Dev tier at $9/user/mo is competitive but the strategic sale is Enterprise at $39/user/mo where the on-prem model runs entirely inside customer infrastructure.
Bottom line: Similar positioning, closer to a preference call than a strategic one.
Choose Sourcegraph Cody over Tabnine if…
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You want fixed-price predictability (per seat, a free entry tier).
- You match the profile Sourcegraph Cody is built for: engineering orgs (50+ devs) that already use Sourcegraph or need Cody's deep code-graph context — the ability to reason across an entire monorepo.
- You need a general-purpose developer & infrastructure option rather than a vertical-specific one.
Choose Tabnine if…
- You want fixed-price predictability (per seat, a free entry tier).
- You match the profile Tabnine is built for: regulated enterprises (banks, hospitals, defense) that need AI code completion but cannot ship code to a cloud LLM.
- You're building for healthcare.
At a glance
| Sourcegraph Cody | Tabnine | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Entry price | Custom pricing | Custom pricing |
| Enterprise available | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing model | Per Seat | Per Seat |
| Verification | Pricing under review | Pricing under review |
| Full pricing | View full pricing | View full pricing |
Pricing last verified September 29, 2026. Verification cadence varies by tool; check each tool page.
Frequently asked questions
See other alternatives in Developer & Infrastructure
Explore more alternatives
Common questions about Sourcegraph Cody and Tabnine
- How much does Sourcegraph Cody cost in 2026?
- Does Sourcegraph Cody have a free plan?
- How often does Sourcegraph Cody change prices?
- What are the best Sourcegraph Cody alternatives in 2026?
- How much does Tabnine cost in 2026?
- Does Tabnine have a free plan?
- How often does Tabnine change prices?
- What are the best Tabnine alternatives in 2026?