Ashby vs Greenhouse — Pricing, Plans, and Verified Costs (2026)
Ashby starts at $400/mo. Greenhouse starts at $542/mo. Ashby is $142/mo cheaper on the entry tier than Greenhouse.
See price history: Ashby · Greenhouse
How pricing works
These two tools don't price the same way, so the headline numbers below aren't directly comparable until you plug in your own volume.
- Ashby (Unknown model) — Ashby bills on a fixed plan from $400/mo, so the listed price is what you pay regardless of volume.
- Greenhouse (Per Usage) — Greenhouse bills purely on usage — Employees + open reqs. There is no fixed per-seat fee, so the monthly cost depends entirely on how much you consume.
Per-minute, per-credit and per-token rates exclude any downstream model, speech or telephony costs unless the vendor states otherwise.
Applicant tracking system (ATS) + recruiting analytics platform, valued $1.5B private. Positioned as the alternative to Greenhouse and Lever for high-growth companies that want serious hiring analytics without enterprise-only pricing. Distinctive for its data-first approach — every hiring pipeline metric is queryable + benchmark-comparable. Foundations from $400/mo ($360/mo annual = 10% off), covering up to 100 employees. Plus + Enterprise custom, typically $30K-120K+/yr. Popular with Series B-D tech companies.
Structured hiring platform (ATS) for mid-market and enterprise, valued $2.7B private. Positioned as the alternative to Lever and Ashby for teams that want interview scorecards and hiring-team collaboration built in. Distinctive for its structured hiring methodology (Talent Wall, kickoff meetings). Pricing is opaque — quote-only, typically $6K-$50K+/year based on employee count. Popular with tech companies scaling from Series B upward.
All plans compared
| Tier role | Plan | Ashby monthly | Ashby annual | Greenhouse monthly | Greenhouse annual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry paid | Foundations / Core (formerly Essential) | $400 | $360 | $542 | $542 |
| Mid tier | — / Plus (formerly Advanced) | — | — | $750 | $750 |
| Pro / power | — / Pro (formerly Expert) | — | — | $1250 | $1250 |
| Enterprise | Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Custom | Custom |
Tier names differ across vendors. Rows are aligned by tier role, not name. Full tier structures on each tool's page.
What each is best for
Ashby is worth it if… high-growth companies (50-500 hires per year) that outgrew Greenhouse or Lever and need integrated ATS + sourcing + analytics + interviewer scheduling in one tool. Custom pricing scales with headcount and modules.
Greenhouse is worth it if… growth-stage companies (50-1,000+ employees) that need structured hiring workflows with interview kits, scorecards, and analytics — the ATS default for structured hiring. Custom-quoted by employee count and tier (Essential / Advanced / Expert).
Bottom line: Similar positioning, closer to a preference call than a strategic one.
Choose Ashby over Greenhouse if…
Choose Ashby if…
- You're comfortable with Ashby's from $400/mo entry point.
- You match the profile Ashby is built for: high-growth companies (50-500 hires per year) that outgrew Greenhouse or Lever and need integrated ATS + sourcing + analytics + interviewer scheduling in one tool.
- You're building for recruiting.
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want to pay only for actual usage (per usage, from $542/mo).
- You match the profile Greenhouse is built for: growth-stage companies (50-1,000+ employees) that need structured hiring workflows with interview kits, scorecards, and analytics — the ATS default for structured hiring.
- You're building for recruiting.
At a glance
| Ashby | Greenhouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Entry price | $400/mo | $542/mo |
| Enterprise available | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing model | — | Per Usage |
| Last verified | September 15, 2026 | September 17, 2026 |
| Full pricing | View full pricing | View full pricing |
Pricing last verified September 17, 2026. Tracked daily.