Jira vs Quickbase — Pricing, Plans, and Verified Costs (2026)
Jira starts at $8.15/mo. Quickbase starts at $35/mo. Jira is $26.85/mo cheaper on the entry tier than Quickbase.
The dominant engineering project management platform from Atlassian, publicly traded (TEAM), ~$50B market cap. Distinctive for its deep customization (workflows, custom fields, JQL query language) that scales to enterprise engineering orgs but overwhelms small teams. Priced free (up to 10 users) then $8.15/user/mo (Standard) up to $16/user/mo (Premium). Real cost bloat comes from add-ons in the Atlassian Marketplace and Data Center licenses (which just got 15-20% price hikes from Appfire).
Enterprise low-code application platform, acquired by Vista Equity Partners for $1B in 2019. Positioned as the alternative to Airtable Enterprise and Microsoft Power Apps for large orgs building internal tools. Distinctive for compliance features (HIPAA, SOC 2, GDPR) that Airtable lacks and for pricing per app rather than per record. Pricing opaque, typically $600+/user/month for Team plan (minimum 20 users). Vista-owned — expect margin work.
All plans compared
| Tier role | Plan | Jira monthly | Jira annual | Quickbase monthly | Quickbase annual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free / starter | Free / — | Free | Free | — | — |
| Entry paid | Standard / Business | $8.15 | $7.91 | $55 | $55 |
| Pro / power | Premium / — | $15.25 | $14.54 | — | — |
| Teams | — / Team | — | — | $35 | $35 |
| Enterprise | Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Custom | Custom |
Tier names differ across vendors. Rows are aligned by tier role, not name. Full tier structures on each tool's page.
What each is best for
Jira is worth it if… engineering teams (10+ developers) that need structured sprint planning, backlogs, and release management — particularly if your org runs Scrum/SAFe/Kanban and you're already in the Atlassian stack (Confluence, Bitbucket). Free covers up to 10 users; Standard adds project roles; Premium adds Advanced Roadmaps and 24/7 support; Enterprise adds data residency.
Quickbase is worth it if… enterprise ops teams (500+ employees) that need low-code custom apps for internal workflows — particularly if you want IT-governed apps that non-developers can build. Team covers small deployments; Business adds advanced admin; Enterprise custom.
Bottom line: Similar positioning, closer to a preference call than a strategic one.
Choose Jira over Quickbase if…
Choose Jira if…
- You want fixed-price predictability (per seat, from $8.15/mo).
- You match the profile Jira is built for: engineering teams (10+ developers) that need structured sprint planning, backlogs, and release management — particularly if your org runs Scrum/SAFe/Kanban and you're already in the Atlassian stack (Confluence, Bitbucket).
- You need a general-purpose project management option rather than a vertical-specific one.
Choose Quickbase if…
- You want fixed-price predictability (per seat, from $35/mo).
- You match the profile Quickbase is built for: enterprise ops teams (500+ employees) that need low-code custom apps for internal workflows — particularly if you want IT-governed apps that non-developers can build.
- You need a general-purpose project management option rather than a vertical-specific one.
At a glance
| Jira | Quickbase | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Entry price | $8.15/mo | $35/mo |
| Enterprise available | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing model | Per Seat | Per Seat |
| Last verified | September 14, 2026 | September 15, 2026 |
| Full pricing | View full pricing | View full pricing |
Pricing last verified September 15, 2026. Tracked daily.
