Decagon vs Fin — Pricing, Plans, and Verified Costs (2026)
Both Decagon and Fin use custom pricing — request quotes from each to compare.
How pricing works
These two tools don't price the same way, so the headline numbers below aren't directly comparable until you plug in your own volume.
- Decagon (Per Usage) — Decagon bills purely on usage. There is no fixed per-seat fee, so the monthly cost depends entirely on how much you consume.
- Fin (Per Usage) — Fin bills purely on usage. There is no fixed per-seat fee, so the monthly cost depends entirely on how much you consume.
Per-minute, per-credit and per-token rates exclude any downstream model, speech or telephony costs unless the vendor states otherwise.
AI-native customer support agent platform. Decagon builds autonomous AI agents for support ops, focused on complex multi-step resolutions. Enterprise-only, all pricing custom-quoted. Reported deals start $100K+/year; well-known customers include Duolingo, Notion, Substack. Raised $131M Series B in 2026.
Intercom's AI customer support agent. Priced separately from Intercom's core plans: $0.99 per resolved conversation (usage-based). Popular with SMBs and mid-market that already use Intercom for messaging and want to add AI autonomous resolution.
All plans compared
| Tier role | Plan | Decagon monthly | Decagon annual | Fin monthly | Fin annual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry paid | — / Fin AI Agent | — | — | $0.99 | $0.99 |
| Enterprise | Enterprise / — | Custom | Custom | — | — |
Tier names differ across vendors. Rows are aligned by tier role, not name. Full tier structures on each tool's page.
What each is best for
Decagon is worth it if… Decagon is worth engaging with if you're a mid-market or enterprise support org looking to replace tier-1 human agents with autonomous AI. Positioning is against Ada and Sierra; Decagon's angle is deep enterprise-workflow integration (Zendesk/Intercom/Salesforce Service Cloud).
Fin is worth it if… 99 per resolved conversation). At scale, it's cheaper than salary equivalents; at low volume, it's cheaper than Ada or Decagon (which have $100K+ minimums).
Bottom line: Similar positioning, closer to a preference call than a strategic one.
Choose Decagon over Fin if…
Choose Decagon if…
- You want to pay only for actual usage (per usage, custom pricing).
- You match the profile Decagon is built for: worth engaging with if you're a mid-market or enterprise support org looking to replace tier-1 human agents with autonomous AI.
- You need a general-purpose customer support option rather than a vertical-specific one.
Choose Fin if…
- You want to pay only for actual usage (per usage, custom pricing).
- You match the profile Fin is built for: you already run Intercom and want to plug in an autonomous AI agent priced per resolution ($0.
- You need a general-purpose customer support option rather than a vertical-specific one.
At a glance
| Decagon | Fin | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Entry price | Custom | Custom |
| Enterprise available | Yes | No |
| Pricing model | Per Usage | Per Usage |
| Last verified | September 20, 2026 | — |
| Full pricing | View full pricing | View full pricing |
Pricing last verified September 20, 2026. Tracked daily.